JUDGMENT

DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.

Following the jury's verdict in this case on July 23, 2018, in favor of Plaintiff Talent Mobile Development, Judgment is hereby entered as follows:

(1) Headios Group did not infringe Talent Mobile Development's REAL CALLER trademark bearing registration no. 4613102;

(2) Headios Group infringed Talent Mobile Development's REAL CALLER trademark bearing registration no. 4671180;

(3) Headios Group infringed Talent Mobile Development's unregistered REAL CALLER ID trademark;

(4) Bassam Istambouli did not infringe Talent Mobile Development's REAL CALLER trademark bearing registration no. 4613102;

(5) Bassam Istambouli infringed Talent Mobile Development's REAL CALLER trademark bearing registration no. 4671180;

(6) Bassam Istambouli infringed Talent Mobile Development's unregistered REAL CALLER ID trademark;

(7) Waleed Shaker did not infringe Talent Mobile Development's REAL CALLER trademark bearing registration no. 4613102;

(8) Waleed Shaker infringed Talent Mobile Development's REAL CALLER trademark bearing registration no. 4671180;

(9) Waleed Shaker infringed Talent Mobile Development's unregistered REAL CALLER ID trademark; 1

(10) Talent Mobile Development's did not infringe Headios Group unregistered Real Caller trademark;

(11) Headios Group did in bad faith register, traffic in, or use a domain name that infringed Talent Mobile development's "Real Caller" trademarks;

(12) Bassam Istambouli did not in bad faith register, traffic in, or use a domain name that infringed Talent Mobile development's "Real Caller" trademarks;

(13) Waleed Shaker did not in bad faith register, traffic in, or use a domain name that infringed Talent Mobile development's "Real Caller" trademarks;

(14) Talent mobile development did not fraudulently register the Real Caller mark bearing registration number 4613102 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office;

(15) Talent mobile development did not fraudulently register the Real Caller mark bearing registration number 4671180 with the United States Patent and Trademark Office;

(16) Talent mobile development did not intentionally interfere with contractual relations between Headios Group and Apple, Inc;

(17) Talent mobile development did not intentionally interfere with contractual relations between Headios Group and Google, Inc;

(18) Defendants are ordered to pay plaintiff monetary damages for trademark infringement in the amount of Seven Hundred Ten Thousand Two Hundred Sixty One Dollars ($710,261.00);

(19) Defendants shall not pay plaintiff any monetary damages for cybersquatting;

(20) Plaintiff did not infringe Headios Group's unregistered mark "Real Caller" and thus Headios Group is not entitled to any monetary damages;

(21) Plaintiff did not interfere with Headios Group's contractual relations with Apple Inc and thus Headios Group is not entitled to any monetary damages;

(22) Plaintiff did not interfere with Headios Group's contractual relations with Google and thus Headios Group is not entitled to any monetary damages.

IT IS SO ORDERED.