Aburto v. Hatton, EDCV 06-00640 JLS (AFM). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20180928a65
Visitors: 14
Filed: Sep. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 27, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . Pursuant to the Order Accepting in Part and Rejecting in Part the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a conditional writ of habeas corpus is granted as follows: Unless Petitioner is resentenced within one hundred twenty (120) days of the date of the Judgment (plus any additional delay authorized under state law), Respondent shall discharge petitioner from all adverse consequen
Summary: JUDGMENT JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . Pursuant to the Order Accepting in Part and Rejecting in Part the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a conditional writ of habeas corpus is granted as follows: Unless Petitioner is resentenced within one hundred twenty (120) days of the date of the Judgment (plus any additional delay authorized under state law), Respondent shall discharge petitioner from all adverse consequenc..
More
JUDGMENT
JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge.
Pursuant to the Order Accepting in Part and Rejecting in Part the Final Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a conditional writ of habeas corpus is granted as follows:
Unless Petitioner is resentenced within one hundred twenty (120) days of the date of the Judgment (plus any additional delay authorized under state law), Respondent shall discharge petitioner from all adverse consequences of his conviction in Riverside County Superior Court, Case No. RIF 096321.
Source: Leagle
