Divine Dharma Meditation International Inc. v. Institute of Latent Energy Studies, 8:16-cv-00226-DFM. (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20181003a08
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 28, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFFS DIVINE DHARMA MEDITATION INTERNATIONAL INC., THUAN DUC NGUYEN, AND BEVERLY NGOC HAI NGUYEN DOUGLAS F. McCORMICK , Magistrate Judge . JUDGMENT This action having been tried before the Court sitting with a jury, the Honorable Douglas F. McCormick, Magistrate Judge, presiding. On September 26, 2018, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendant Institute of Latent Energy Studies ("Defendant") in this action. The issues having been duly tried and the jury having
Summary: JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFFS DIVINE DHARMA MEDITATION INTERNATIONAL INC., THUAN DUC NGUYEN, AND BEVERLY NGOC HAI NGUYEN DOUGLAS F. McCORMICK , Magistrate Judge . JUDGMENT This action having been tried before the Court sitting with a jury, the Honorable Douglas F. McCormick, Magistrate Judge, presiding. On September 26, 2018, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendant Institute of Latent Energy Studies ("Defendant") in this action. The issues having been duly tried and the jury having ..
More
JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFFS DIVINE DHARMA MEDITATION INTERNATIONAL INC., THUAN DUC NGUYEN, AND BEVERLY NGOC HAI NGUYEN
DOUGLAS F. McCORMICK, Magistrate Judge.
JUDGMENT
This action having been tried before the Court sitting with a jury, the Honorable Douglas F. McCormick, Magistrate Judge, presiding. On September 26, 2018, a jury returned a verdict in favor of Defendant Institute of Latent Energy Studies ("Defendant") in this action.
The issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered a verdict.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Plaintiffs Divine Dharma Meditation International, Inc., Thuan Duc Nguyen, and Beverly Ngoc Hai Nguyen (collectively, the "Plaintiffs"), take nothing under this action, the action be dismissed on the merits with prejudice, and that the Defendant recover from the Plaintiffs its costs of action, taxed in the sum to be determined by Motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
