Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Brown v. California Dep't of Corr. & Rehab., CV 12-9126 DMG (MRW). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20181009e52 Visitors: 10
Filed: Oct. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DOLLY M. GEE , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which the parties objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. See, e.g., Sexton v. Beaudreauz, ___ U
More

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which the parties objected.

The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. See, e.g., Sexton v. Beaudreauz, ___ U.S. ___, 2018 WL 3148261 at * 4 (June 28, 2018) (per curiam remand to Ninth Circuit due to "fundamental error" for failing to consider "the arguments or theories [that] could have supported the state court's summary decision").

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer