Thompson v. Target Corporation, CV 18-07308 DSF (GJSx). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20181019h75
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 15, 2018
Summary: Order GRANTING Motion to Remand (Dkt. 17) DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Plaintiff moves for remand to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. This motion noticed a hearing date of October 22, 2018. Any opposition was due October 1, 2018. Local Rule 7-9. No opposition has been filed; the Court deems the lack of opposition to be consent to the motion. Local Rule 7-12; see also Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52 , 53 (9th Cir. 1995). The Court GRANTS the unopposed motion. T
Summary: Order GRANTING Motion to Remand (Dkt. 17) DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Plaintiff moves for remand to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. This motion noticed a hearing date of October 22, 2018. Any opposition was due October 1, 2018. Local Rule 7-9. No opposition has been filed; the Court deems the lack of opposition to be consent to the motion. Local Rule 7-12; see also Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52 , 53 (9th Cir. 1995). The Court GRANTS the unopposed motion. Th..
More
Order GRANTING Motion to Remand (Dkt. 17)
DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.
Plaintiff moves for remand to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. This motion noticed a hearing date of October 22, 2018. Any opposition was due October 1, 2018. Local Rule 7-9. No opposition has been filed; the Court deems the lack of opposition to be consent to the motion. Local Rule 7-12; see also Ghazali v. Moran, 46 F.3d 52, 53 (9th Cir. 1995).
The Court GRANTS the unopposed motion. The case is REMANDED to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
