Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Micenheimer v. Finander, CV 16-4314-CJC (JEM). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20181019h77 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CORMAC J. CARNEY , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation
More

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Plaintiff has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action against Defendants Finander, Morris, Shank, and Rabanipour with prejudice and dismissing the action against the Doe defendant without prejudice.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer