Franklin v. Soto, CV 15-8379-CBM (KK). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20181113657
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSUELO B. MARSHALL , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which the parties have objected. The Court accepts the findings and recomme
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONSUELO B. MARSHALL , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which the parties have objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommen..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
CONSUELO B. MARSHALL, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Third Amended Complaint, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which the parties have objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is (1) GRANTED with respect to
• Plaintiff's First and Fourteenth Amendment claim against defendant Rowe;
• Plaintiff's First Amendment claim against defendant Harris;
• Plaintiff's First and Fourteenth Amendment claim against defendant Martinez; and
• Plaintiff's First Amendment claim against defendant Wofford; and (2) DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's First Amendment claim against defendant Bojoroquez.
Source: Leagle
