Shokur v. Sessions, CV 18-2934-JFW (FFM). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20181127771
Visitors: 16
Filed: Nov. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN F. WALTER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN F. WALTER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED t..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JOHN F. WALTER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any written objections to the Report. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that: (1) respondents' motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and (2) petitioner's fourth claim for relief is dismissed without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction.
Source: Leagle
