Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

King v. Community Insurance Company, 2:16-CV-03722-ODW(RAOx). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20181207a22 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . Pursuant to the Court's Order Granting, In Part, and Denying, In Part, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 85 (the "Original Order")), as amended pursuant to the parties' subsequent stipulation (ECF No. 99 (the "Amended Order")), JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Hospital and against Defendants Community Insur
More

JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the Court's Order Granting, In Part, and Denying, In Part, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 85 (the "Original Order")), as amended pursuant to the parties' subsequent stipulation (ECF No. 99 (the "Amended Order")),

JUDGMENT IS ENTERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff Martin Luther King, Jr. Community Hospital and against Defendants Community Insurance Company, d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield; Anthem, Inc. (erroneously sued as Anthem, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross And Blue Shield); Budco Group, Inc., and the Budco Group, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan on Plaintiff's first cause of action for ERISA benefits in the total amount of $418,326.46, as set forth in the Original Order and Amended Order. 2. All other remaining claims and counterclaims are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 3. Plaintiff shall file its motion for attorneys' fees no later than twenty-one days following the entry of judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer