Hernandez v. City of Los Angeles, CV16-02689 AB (JEMx). (2018)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20181213880
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2018
Summary: [ PROPOSED ] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Based on the stipulation of the parties and GOOD CAUSE appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action against Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, VICTOR PARTIDA and JEREMY PAIZ is dismissed, with prejudice. Each party to bear their own costs and fees. This dismissal does not constitute an adjudication on the merits. IT IS SO ORDERED.
[ PROPOSED] ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR., District Judge.
Based on the stipulation of the parties and GOOD CAUSE appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-entitled action against Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, VICTOR PARTIDA and JEREMY PAIZ is dismissed, with prejudice. Each party to bear their own costs and fees. This dismissal does not constitute an adjudication on the merits.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
