Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Fairon v. Starbucks #5749, 8:18-cv-01422-CJC-ASDx. (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20181221a51 Visitors: 5
Filed: Dec. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2018
Summary: ORDER FOR JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [17] CORMAC J. CARNEY , District Judge . WHEREAS, Defendants STARBUCKS #5749 ("STARBUCKS") and ALISO EQUITIES, LTD. ("ALISO") on one hand, and Plaintiff GUY FAIRON ("FARION"), on the other hand, stipulated, through their respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a), that all claims and demands asserted by FAIRON in this action shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own cos
More

ORDER FOR JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [17]

WHEREAS, Defendants STARBUCKS #5749 ("STARBUCKS") and ALISO EQUITIES, LTD. ("ALISO") on one hand, and Plaintiff GUY FAIRON ("FARION"), on the other hand, stipulated, through their respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a), that all claims and demands asserted by FAIRON in this action shall be dismissed with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and attorney fees; and

WHEREAS, it appears to the Court that the terms of the stipulation appear proper, and upon good cause showing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims and demands asserted by FAIRON in this action shall be and hereby are dismissed.

IT ISH HEREBY ORDERED with prejudice, each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer