Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Valdes v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 8:18-CV-1263-JVS-(DFMx). (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20190207800 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER FOR JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, CARLOS VALDES and MINERVA VALDES (collectively, the "Plaintiffs"), on one hand, and Defendants WELLS FARGO, N.A., and QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, on the other hand, through their respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a), that all claims and demands asserted by Plaintiffs in this action shall be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, and each
More

ORDER FOR JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs, CARLOS VALDES and MINERVA VALDES (collectively, the "Plaintiffs"), on one hand, and Defendants WELLS FARGO, N.A., and QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORPORATION, on the other hand, through their respective attorneys of record, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 41(a), that all claims and demands asserted by Plaintiffs in this action shall be dismissed WITH PREJUDICE, and each party shall bear their own costs and attorney fees; and

WHEREAS, it appears to the Court that the terms of the stipulation appear proper, and upon good cause showing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims and demands asserted by Plaintiffs in this action shall be and hereby are dismissed.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the dismissal is WITH PREJUDICE, and each party to bear their own costs and attorney's fees.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer