Acosta v. County of Los Angeles, 2:15-cv-09857 PJW. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190208b23
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER DISMSSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PATRICK J. WALSH , District Judge . The Court, having considered the stipulation between plaintiff Frank Acosta ("Plaintiff") and defendants County of Los Angeles, Deputy Oscar Calderon, Deputy Cesar Huerta, Deputy Shawn O'Donnell, Deputy Michael Scott ("Defendants"), hereby approves the stipulation and orders that all claims against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice pursuant
Summary: ORDER DISMSSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PATRICK J. WALSH , District Judge . The Court, having considered the stipulation between plaintiff Frank Acosta ("Plaintiff") and defendants County of Los Angeles, Deputy Oscar Calderon, Deputy Cesar Huerta, Deputy Shawn O'Donnell, Deputy Michael Scott ("Defendants"), hereby approves the stipulation and orders that all claims against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice pursuant t..
More
ORDER DISMSSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
PATRICK J. WALSH, District Judge.
The Court, having considered the stipulation between plaintiff Frank Acosta ("Plaintiff") and defendants County of Los Angeles, Deputy Oscar Calderon, Deputy Cesar Huerta, Deputy Shawn O'Donnell, Deputy Michael Scott ("Defendants"), hereby approves the stipulation and orders that all claims against Defendants are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). The parties to bear their own costs.
It is so ordered.
Source: Leagle
