Bratton v. County of Riverside, EDCV 18-44-JVS (GJS). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190211802
Visitors: 10
Filed: Feb. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all pleadings and documents filed and lodged in this action, the motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint brought by certain Defendants (Dkt. 47, "Motion"), and the related Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 50, "Report"). The time for filing objections to the Repo
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all pleadings and documents filed and lodged in this action, the motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint brought by certain Defendants (Dkt. 47, "Motion"), and the related Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 50, "Report"). The time for filing objections to the Repor..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, all pleadings and documents filed and lodged in this action, the motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint brought by certain Defendants (Dkt. 47, "Motion"), and the related Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 50, "Report"). The time for filing objections to the Report has passed, and no objections have been filed with the Court.
Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; (2) Defendants A. Gayda, J. Rodriguez, R. Garcia, and A. Hadraki are dismissed without leave to amend; (3) Defendants A. Sanchez, P. Sanchez, and Chief Deputy Warden are dismissed without prejudice, pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and the Magistrate Judge is directed to issue any appropriate orders with respect to further proceedings in this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
