Brown v. Biter, CV 14-3934-AG (KK). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190304528
Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDREW J. GUILFORD , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the First
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDREW J. GUILFORD , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the First ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No objections have been filed. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the First Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
