Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gilliam v. Bank of America, N.A., 8:17-cv-01296-DOC (JPR). (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20190305689 Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AND RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A. DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . Having granted the motion brought by defendant Bank of America, N.A. ("BANA") to dismiss with prejudice all claims against BANA (Docket No. 113), and all such claims against BANA having been dismissed by this Court with prejudice, and Having granted the motion brought by defendant Recontrust Company, N.A. ("Recontrust") to dismiss with prejudice all claims against Recontrus
More

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. AND RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.

Having granted the motion brought by defendant Bank of America, N.A. ("BANA") to dismiss with prejudice all claims against BANA (Docket No. 113), and all such claims against BANA having been dismissed by this Court with prejudice, and

Having granted the motion brought by defendant Recontrust Company, N.A. ("Recontrust") to dismiss with prejudice all claims against Recontrust (Docket No. 62), and all such claims against Recontrust having been dismissed by this Court with prejudice,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, that judgment shall be and hereby is entered in favor of BANA and Recontrust and against Plaintiffs Rickey M. Gilliam and Barbara A. Gilliam ("Plaintiffs) and that Plaintiffs shall take and recover nothing against BANA or Recontrust in this action. BANA and Recontrust shall recover their costs as allowed by law.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer