Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Patten v. Deschamps, CV 18-1869-VAP (GJS). (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20190320939 Visitors: 15
Filed: Mar. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint [Dkt. 1], all pleadings and documents filed and lodged in this action, the motion for judgment on the pleadings brought by Defendants (Dkt. 38, "Motion"), the Opposition to the Motion [Dkt. 60] and related Reply [Dkts. 61-62], the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 64, "Re
More

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint [Dkt. 1], all pleadings and documents filed and lodged in this action, the motion for judgment on the pleadings brought by Defendants (Dkt. 38, "Motion"), the Opposition to the Motion [Dkt. 60] and related Reply [Dkts. 61-62], the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [Dkt. 64, "Report"], and Plaintiff's Objections to the Report [Dkt. 65]. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Motion is GRANTED; and (2) this action is dismissed without prejudice.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer