Sedillo v. Montgomery, CV 16-1382 DSF (JC). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190327936
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . The Court has conducted the review required by 28 U.S.C. 636 and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge reflected in the November 29, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the operative First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is d
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . The Court has conducted the review required by 28 U.S.C. 636 and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge reflected in the November 29, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the operative First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is de..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.
The Court has conducted the review required by 28 U.S.C. § 636 and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge reflected in the November 29, 2018 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that (1) the operative First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody is denied on the merits; (2) this action is dismissed with prejudice; and (3) Judgment shall be entered accordingly.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel for respondent.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
