Williams v. Yett, CV 13-1551 AB (KK). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190329973
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR DEFENDANTS ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . This action having been tried before the Court sitting with a jury, the Honorable Andre Birotte Jr., District Judge, presiding; the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict, IT IS ORDERED: Judgment is entered in this action in favor of defendants E. Yett, C. Steeb and S. Baumgardner, and against plaintiff Charles A. Williams on all claims, according to the special
Summary: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR DEFENDANTS ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . This action having been tried before the Court sitting with a jury, the Honorable Andre Birotte Jr., District Judge, presiding; the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict, IT IS ORDERED: Judgment is entered in this action in favor of defendants E. Yett, C. Steeb and S. Baumgardner, and against plaintiff Charles A. Williams on all claims, according to the special ..
More
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON THE VERDICT FOR DEFENDANTS
ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR., District Judge.
This action having been tried before the Court sitting with a jury, the Honorable Andre Birotte Jr., District Judge, presiding; the issues having been duly tried and the jury having duly rendered its verdict, IT IS ORDERED:
Judgment is entered in this action in favor of defendants E. Yett, C. Steeb and S. Baumgardner, and against plaintiff Charles A. Williams on all claims, according to the special verdict of the trial jury returned in open court on February 28, 2019.
Source: Leagle
