Takehara v. Jaguar Land Rover North Amercica, LLC, 2:18-CV-03121-MWF-RAO. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190416764
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 08, 2019
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ORDER [ Originally filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC 697 497 ] MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , Senior District Judge . The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this action, including all claims and counterclaims stated herein against
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ORDER [ Originally filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC 697 497 ] MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , Senior District Judge . The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this action, including all claims and counterclaims stated herein against ..
More
JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
ORDER
[Originally filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. BC 697 497]
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, Senior District Judge.
The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this action, including all claims and counterclaims stated herein against all parties, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs.
ORDER
The stipulation is approved. The entire action, including all claims and counterclaims stated herein against all parties, is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
