Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. $63,897.08 Seized From Bank of America Acct. No. `9404, CV15-07753-MRW. (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20190507673 Visitors: 1
Filed: May 06, 2019
Latest Update: May 06, 2019
Summary: [PROPOSED] CONSENT JUDGMENT AS TO CLAIMANT IREDIA JOE EKUKPE AKA JOE IREDIA EKUKPE MICHAEL R. WILNER , Magistrate Judge . This action was filed on October 2, 2016 against the defendants $20,735.74 seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank account Number `5538 and $1,470.34 Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account Number `6865 ("defendant funds"). Iredia Joe Ekukpe aka Joe Iredia Ekukpe ("claimant" or "Ekukpe") from whom the defendant funds were seized, filed a claim and an answer on November 10, 20
More

[PROPOSED] CONSENT JUDGMENT AS TO CLAIMANT IREDIA JOE EKUKPE AKA JOE IREDIA EKUKPE

This action was filed on October 2, 2016 against the defendants $20,735.74 seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank account Number `5538 and $1,470.34 Seized from JP Morgan Chase Bank Account Number `6865 ("defendant funds"). Iredia Joe Ekukpe aka Joe Iredia Ekukpe ("claimant" or "Ekukpe") from whom the defendant funds were seized, filed a claim and an answer on November 10, 2015. No other claims or answers have been filed as to the defendant funds, and the time for filing such statements of interest and answers has expired. Plaintiff United States of America and the claimant have reached an agreement that is dispositive of the action, and have requested that this consent judgment be entered as to these defendant funds and claimant only. Nothing in this consent judgment is intended or should be interpreted as an admission of wrongdoing by the claimant.

WHEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

A. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and 1355 and over the parties hereto.

B. The Complaint for Forfeiture states a claim for relief pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(a)(1)(A) and (C) and 18 U.S.C. § 984.

C. Notice of this action has been given and published in accordance with law. No one other than claimants has filed a claim or answer and the time for filing claims and answers have expired. The allegations set out in the complaint are sufficient to establish a basis for forfeiture.

D. $12,206.08 of the defendant funds, together with all interest earned by the government on the entire amount of the defendant funds since seizure, shall be forfeited to the United States of America, and no other right, title, or interest shall exist therein. The government shall dispose of the forfeited property according to law.

E. $10,000.00 of the defendant funds shall be paid to Ekukpe through his attorney, Mr. Michael P. Heiskell, Johnson Vaughn & Heiskell, 5601 Bridge Street, Suite 220, Fort Worth, Texas 76112.

F. The funds to be returned to the claimant shall, at the government's option, be returned by either check or wire transfer within 60 days of the date this Judgment is entered. If the United States elects to make the payment by check, the check will be payable to "The Johnson Vaughn & Heiskell client trust account," and mailed to Iredia Joe Ekukpe aka Joe Iredia Ekukpe in care of his attorney, Mr. Michael P. Heiskell, Johnson Vaughn & Heiskell, 5601 Bridge Street, Suite 220, Fort Worth, Texas 76112. If the United States elects to make the payment by wire transfer, the funds will be wire transferred to The Johnson Vaughn & Heiskell Client Trust Account. The claimant agrees to provide the necessary bank account information and personal identifiers upon request from the United States.

G. The claimant has released the United States of America, its agencies, agents, and officers, including employees and agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, from any and all claims, actions or liabilities arising out of or related to this action, including, without limitation, any petitions for remission, which the Claimant hereby withdraws and waives any rights he may have to seek remission or mitigation of the forfeiture of the defendant funds, any claim for attorney's fees, costs or interest which may be asserted on their behalf, whether pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465 or otherwise.

H. The Court finds that there was reasonable cause for the institution of these proceedings. This Judgment shall be construed as a certificate of reasonable cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2465.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer