Glass v. Kernan, 2:18-cv-00641-PA (MAA). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190510793
Visitors: 6
Filed: May 09, 2019
Latest Update: May 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 28), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30), the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 38), Plaintiff's Objection (ECF No. 40), and Defendants' Reply (ECF No. 41). After conducting a de novo review of the portions of t
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 28), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30), the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 38), Plaintiff's Objection (ECF No. 40), and Defendants' Reply (ECF No. 41). After conducting a de novo review of the portions of th..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 28), Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 30), the other records on file herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 38), Plaintiff's Objection (ECF No. 40), and Defendants' Reply (ECF No. 41). After conducting a de novo review of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is
ACCEPTED and ADOPTED;
2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; Case 2:18-cv-00641-PA-MAA Document 42 Filed 05/09/19 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:463
3. Plaintiff is DENIED leave to amend the First Amended Complaint; and
4. Judgment shall be ENTERED dismissing the entire action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
