Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lacambra v. City of Orange, 8:18-cv-00960-RGK-KES. (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20190605c83 Visitors: 8
Filed: May 31, 2019
Latest Update: May 31, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff did not file objections. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's 18 U.S.C. 241 cl
More

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings and all the records and files herein, along with the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff did not file objections. The Court accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's 18 U.S.C. § 241 claims and his claims against Defendants Franchise Tax Board, Yee, Bosler, Cohen, and Newsom are dismissed without leave to amend.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer