Brown v. Sullivan, CV 17-1918 SJO (MRW). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190611671
Visitors: 50
Filed: Jun. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 07, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered d..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
