Filed: Jun. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [JS-6] TERRY J. HATTER, JR. , District Judge . This is a matter involving allegations of pattern or practice discrimination on the basis of disability in violation of the Fair Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3601, et seq. (the FHA), and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. 12131, et seq. (the ADA) against the City of San Jacinto, California. Plaintiff United States initiated the action on November 9, 2012 (Dkt. 1), and pri
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [JS-6] TERRY J. HATTER, JR. , District Judge . This is a matter involving allegations of pattern or practice discrimination on the basis of disability in violation of the Fair Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 3601, et seq. (the FHA), and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. 12131, et seq. (the ADA) against the City of San Jacinto, California. Plaintiff United States initiated the action on November 9, 2012 (Dkt. 1), and priv..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [JS-6]
TERRY J. HATTER, JR., District Judge.
This is a matter involving allegations of pattern or practice discrimination on the basis of disability in violation of the Fair Housing Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601, et seq. (the FHA), and Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131, et seq. (the ADA) against the City of San Jacinto, California. Plaintiff United States initiated the action on November 9, 2012 (Dkt. 1), and private plaintiffs, Rajeeyah Bilal-Varney, et al., filed a separate complaint alleging similar claims on December 12, 2012. The Court entered an order consolidating the two actions for all purposes except trial on February 26, 2012. (Dkt. 14).
On June 16, 2014, the Court entered an Amended Consent Decree with a five-year term in the matter requiring Defendant City of San Jacinto to comply with its provisions. (Dkt. 39). The Decree expired on its terms on June 16, 2019. Id. at ¶ 45. For that reason, and because the parties agreed in their Stipulation of Dismissal that Defendant City of San Jacinto achieved and sustained full compliance with the Decree during its term (Dkt. 62), the Court hereby dismisses this action with prejudice.
