Center for Biological Diversity v. U.S. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 2:18-cv-06775-GW-AS. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190705700
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jul. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT GEORGE H. WU , District Judge . Judgement is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and Center for Food Safety and against Defendants U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al. and Defendant-Intervenors Cadiz, Inc. et al. in accordance with the Court's June 20, 2019 final ruling on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF No. 75. Defendants' October 13, 2017 determination regarding the Cadiz pipeline is hereby set aside and remanded to Defendan
Summary: JUDGMENT GEORGE H. WU , District Judge . Judgement is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and Center for Food Safety and against Defendants U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al. and Defendant-Intervenors Cadiz, Inc. et al. in accordance with the Court's June 20, 2019 final ruling on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF No. 75. Defendants' October 13, 2017 determination regarding the Cadiz pipeline is hereby set aside and remanded to Defendant..
More
JUDGMENT
GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.
Judgement is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs Center for Biological Diversity and Center for Food Safety and against Defendants U.S. Bureau of Land Management et al. and Defendant-Intervenors Cadiz, Inc. et al. in accordance with the Court's June 20, 2019 final ruling on the parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF No. 75. Defendants' October 13, 2017 determination regarding the Cadiz pipeline is hereby set aside and remanded to Defendants. See 5 U.S.C. § 706. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve any motion for attorneys' fees and costs.
Source: Leagle
