Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Lawson v. PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc., 8:18-CV-00705AG-JPR. (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20190708407 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT ANDREW J. GUILFORD , District Judge . TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment ("Motion") of Defendant PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. ("Defendant") came on regularly for hearing on June 10, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., the Honorable Andrew J. Guilford presiding. The Court, having considered the evidence proffered in support of and in opposition to Defendant's Motion for
More

JUDGMENT

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment ("Motion") of Defendant PPG Architectural Finishes, Inc. ("Defendant") came on regularly for hearing on June 10, 2019 at 10:00 a.m., the Honorable Andrew J. Guilford presiding.

The Court, having considered the evidence proffered in support of and in opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Adjudication, having read and considered the supporting, opposition and reply points and authorities, and having heard and considered the arguments of counsel, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby finds that there are no genuine disputes of material fact on at least one required element of each of Plaintiff Wallen Lawson's claims, and that accordingly, Defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on all causes of action in Plaintiff Wallen Lawson's Second Amended Complaint. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is hereby GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff and that Plaintiff shall take nothing as to his complaint against Defendant. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that Defendant is the prevailing party in this action and shall be entitled to recover its litigation costs in this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer