Dietz v. Sullivan, CV 18-10154 PA (FFM). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190710649
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections to the Report. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo de
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE PERCY ANDERSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections to the Report. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo det..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
PERCY ANDERSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire record in this action, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and the objections to the Report. Good cause appearing, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations contained in the Report after having made a de novo determination of the portions to which objections were directed.
IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered dismissing the Petition with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
