Clinton v. Paramo, CV 18-6209 SVW (MRW). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190715568
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. STEPHEN V. WILSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Supplemental Statement of Decision. Further, the Court engaged in a de novo review ofthose portions of the Report to which Petitioner objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judg
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. STEPHEN V. WILSON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Supplemental Statement of Decision. Further, the Court engaged in a de novo review ofthose portions of the Report to which Petitioner objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
STEPHEN V. WILSON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court reviewed the petition, the records on file, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the Supplemental Statement of Decision. Further, the Court engaged in a de novo review ofthose portions of the Report to which Petitioner objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
