Filed: Jul. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) ANDREW J. GUILFORD , District Judge . The Court having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (the "Stipulation" ) entered into by and between Carl Hardin ( "Plaintiff" ), as Trustee of the Hardin Family Trust Dated November 9, 2005, and defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and U.S. B
Summary: ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) ANDREW J. GUILFORD , District Judge . The Court having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (the "Stipulation" ) entered into by and between Carl Hardin ( "Plaintiff" ), as Trustee of the Hardin Family Trust Dated November 9, 2005, and defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and U.S. Ba..
More
ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO DISMISS ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
ANDREW J. GUILFORD, District Judge.
The Court having considered the Stipulation to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (the "Stipulation") entered into by and between Carl Hardin ("Plaintiff"), as Trustee of the Hardin Family Trust Dated November 9, 2005, and defendants Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and U.S. Bank N.A., successor trustee to Bank of America, N.A., successor to LaSalle Bank N.A., as trustee, for the WaMu Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR10 (collectively, the "Defendants," and together with Plaintiff, the "Parties"), and good cause appearing therefor,
IT IS ORDERED that the Stipulation is APPROVED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Parties shall bear their own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with this action.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing the terms of the separate settlement agreement entered into between the Parties.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint [Dkt. No. 21] is hereby vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
