Hobley v. Koenig, 2:16-cv-09682-VBF (AFM). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190816832
Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE R & R: DENYING HABEAS PETITION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK , Senior District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the file and the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has reviewed de novo review those parts of the R&R to which a party specifically objected. It is therefore ORDERED that: The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. The habeas corpus petition is DE
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING THE R & R: DENYING HABEAS PETITION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK , Senior District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the file and the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has reviewed de novo review those parts of the R&R to which a party specifically objected. It is therefore ORDERED that: The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. The habeas corpus petition is DEN..
More
ORDER ADOPTING THE R & R: DENYING HABEAS PETITION AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, Senior District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the file and the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has reviewed de novo review those parts of the R&R to which a party specifically objected.
It is therefore ORDERED that:
The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.
The habeas corpus petition is DENIED.
This action will be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Court will rule on a certificate of appealability by separate order.
As required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), final judgment consistent with this Order and with the R&R shall be entered as a separate document.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
