Inman v. Hakkasan Holdings, LLC, 2:19-cv-04532-MWF(ASx). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190823964
Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . ORDER The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice (the "Stipulation") filed by Plaintiff NEIL INMAN ("Plaintiff") and Defendant HAKKASAN HOLDINGS, LLC ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties") IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-referenced action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rul
Summary: ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD , District Judge . ORDER The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice (the "Stipulation") filed by Plaintiff NEIL INMAN ("Plaintiff") and Defendant HAKKASAN HOLDINGS, LLC ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties") IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-referenced action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule..
More
ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Joint Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice (the "Stipulation") filed by Plaintiff NEIL INMAN ("Plaintiff") and Defendant HAKKASAN HOLDINGS, LLC ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties")
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-referenced action is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation, each party shall bear their own respective attorney's fees and costs incurred in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
