Rugley v. City of Los Angeles, CV18-08617 R (JCx). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190826664
Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 23, 2019
Summary: MODIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER (State Case No. NC059152) JACQUELINE CHOOLJIAN , Magistrate Judge . GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, and in accordance with the parties' Stipulation Re Protective Order, the Court's August 22, 2019 Order Re (Proposed) Stipulation Re Protective Order, and the parties' Stipulation of Non-Opposition to Court's Inclined Modifications and the Requested Protective Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, and OFFICER CHACON; and OFFICER PEA
Summary: MODIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER (State Case No. NC059152) JACQUELINE CHOOLJIAN , Magistrate Judge . GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, and in accordance with the parties' Stipulation Re Protective Order, the Court's August 22, 2019 Order Re (Proposed) Stipulation Re Protective Order, and the parties' Stipulation of Non-Opposition to Court's Inclined Modifications and the Requested Protective Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, and OFFICER CHACON; and OFFICER PEAR..
More
MODIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER
(State Case No. NC059152)
JACQUELINE CHOOLJIAN, Magistrate Judge.
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, and in accordance with the parties' Stipulation Re Protective Order, the Court's August 22, 2019 Order Re (Proposed) Stipulation Re Protective Order, and the parties' Stipulation of Non-Opposition to Court's Inclined Modifications and the Requested Protective Order, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a public entity, and OFFICER CHACON; and OFFICER PEARSON, as employees of Defendant City of Los Angeles, a public entity, and Plaintiff CHRISTIAN KIANDRE RUGLEY, by and through their respective counsel, are to abide by the Stipulation Re Protective Order with the following modifications:
1. Paragraph 3 is modified as follows: (a) "other than during a court hearing or at trial" is inserted after "any testimony conversations, or presentations by the Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material[]"; and (b) the last two sentences of such paragraph are modified to read as follows: "Any use of Protected Material during a court hearing or at trial shall be governed by the orders of the presiding judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material during a court hearing or at trial."
2. Paragraph 5(b) is modified to read as follows: "for testimony given in deposition, that the Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of the deposition, all protected testimony."
3. Paragraph 8 is modified as follows: "or unless otherwise required by the law or court order" is inserted after "the Designating Party's permission[]" in the second to last sentence thereof.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
