Hoist Fitness Systems, Inc. v. TuffStuff Fitness International, Inc., 5:17-CV-01388 AB (KK). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190911a52
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2019
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES: 1. Defendant TuffStuff's Accused Products do not infringe the asserted patent claims based on the Court's construction of the "pivotally mounted/ing" terms. 2. The deadline for filing any motions for attorney's fees pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and 35 U.S.C. 285 shall be stayed pending the disposition of any appeal. See Pharmacia &
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES: 1. Defendant TuffStuff's Accused Products do not infringe the asserted patent claims based on the Court's construction of the "pivotally mounted/ing" terms. 2. The deadline for filing any motions for attorney's fees pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and 35 U.S.C. 285 shall be stayed pending the disposition of any appeal. See Pharmacia & U..
More
FINAL JUDGMENT
ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR., District Judge.
The Court, having considered the stipulation of the parties, hereby ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES:
1. Defendant TuffStuff's Accused Products do not infringe the asserted patent claims based on the Court's construction of the "pivotally mounted/ing" terms.
2. The deadline for filing any motions for attorney's fees pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d) and 35 U.S.C. § 285 shall be stayed pending the disposition of any appeal. See Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 182 F.3d 1356, 1360 n. 2 (Fed Cir. 1999).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
