Cohn v. Smith, CV 14-4647 AB(JC). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190912494
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 04, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDRE BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition") and accompanying documents, and all of the records herein, including the July 12, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"), and petitioner's objections to the Report and Recomme
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDRE BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition") and accompanying documents, and all of the records herein, including the July 12, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"), and petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommen..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ANDRE BIROTTE, JR., District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody ("Petition") and accompanying documents, and all of the records herein, including the July 12, 2019 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report and Recommendation"), and petitioner's objections to the Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). The Court has further made a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objection is made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the Objections
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition is denied and this action is dismissed with prejudice, and that Judgment be entered accordingly.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on counsel for petitioner and counsel for respondent.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
