Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Arndt v. County of Los Angeles, 2:18-cv-10699 GW(MRWx). (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20190925837 Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 20, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 20, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES [DKT. NO. 55] GEORGE H. WU , District Judge . On July 11, 2019, the Court granted the motion to dismiss the third claim in the Second Amended Complaint, which was the sole claim against Defendant County of Los Angeles. The Court denied the motion to dismiss as to the first claim against defendant Borits-Root and the second claim against defendants Andrew LeFebvre, Jeffrey Shreves, and Victor Ekanem. Dkt. No. 55. The plaintiff was given two week
More

JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES [DKT. NO. 55]

On July 11, 2019, the Court granted the motion to dismiss the third claim in the Second Amended Complaint, which was the sole claim against Defendant County of Los Angeles. The Court denied the motion to dismiss as to the first claim against defendant Borits-Root and the second claim against defendants Andrew LeFebvre, Jeffrey Shreves, and Victor Ekanem. Dkt. No. 55. The plaintiff was given two weeks leave to amend. Dkt. No. 55, p. 1.

On July 24, 2019, plaintiff filed his Third Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 56. The plaintiff did not amend the former third claim against the County of Los Angeles.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the above-entitled action be and hereby is dismissed as to the County of Los Angeles, and the judgment be entered forthwith against Plaintiff Alexander David Arndt and in favor of Defendant

County of Los Angeles, a public entity.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer