United Studios of Self Defense, Inc. v. Rinehart, SA CV 18-1048-DOC (DFMx). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20190930931
Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2019
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation entered on August 30, 2019 (Dkt. 152), recommending that Defendants' Motion to Pierce the Attorney-Client Privilege Under the Crime-Fraud Exception (Dkt. 73) be denied. Defendants filed objections. See Dkt. 179. The Report and Recommendation is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge DAVID O. CARTER , District Judge . Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation entered on August 30, 2019 (Dkt. 152), recommending that Defendants' Motion to Pierce the Attorney-Client Privilege Under the Crime-Fraud Exception (Dkt. 73) be denied. Defendants filed objections. See Dkt. 179. The Report and Recommendation is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a..
More
Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation entered on August 30, 2019 (Dkt. 152), recommending that Defendants' Motion to Pierce the Attorney-Client Privilege Under the Crime-Fraud Exception (Dkt. 73) be denied. Defendants filed objections. See Dkt. 179.
The Report and Recommendation is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Even if a de novo standard applied, the Court would still adopt the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted.
Source: Leagle
