Perri v. Poladian, 8:19-cv-01200-DSF-MRW. (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20191011e05
Visitors: 16
Filed: Oct. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2019
Summary: Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service or 60 days if the defendant is the United States. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). In this case, Vahe Poladian failed to plead or otherwise defend within the relevant time. The Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before October 18, 2019 why the claims against the non-appearing defendant(s) should not be dismissed
Summary: Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution DALE S. FISCHER , District Judge . Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service or 60 days if the defendant is the United States. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1). In this case, Vahe Poladian failed to plead or otherwise defend within the relevant time. The Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before October 18, 2019 why the claims against the non-appearing defendant(s) should not be dismissed ..
More
Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution
DALE S. FISCHER, District Judge.
Generally, defendants must answer the complaint within 21 days after service or 60 days if the defendant is the United States. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1).
In this case, Vahe Poladian failed to plead or otherwise defend within the relevant time. The Court orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before October 18, 2019 why the claims against the non-appearing defendant(s) should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Failure to respond to this Order may result in sanctions, including dismissal for failure to prosecute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
