McNamara v. Becerra, 2:18-cv-09481-AB (SHK). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20191101f43
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 28, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 28, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDRE BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that t
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDRE BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that th..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ANDRE BIROTTE, JR., District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Petition be DENIED and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
