Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mandoyan v. County of Los Angeles, 2:19-cv-02537-JFW-RAO. (2019)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20191118587 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 12, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE JOHN F. WALTER , District Judge . On April 3, 2019, Plaintiff Caren Carl Mandoyan ("Plaintiff") instituted this action by filing the Complaint, which Plaintiff amended voluntarily three times. On September 9, 2019, Defendants County of Los Angeles (the "County") and John Naimo ("Naimo") filed a Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Defendants Bobby Denham ("Denha
More

JUDGMENT DISMISSING PLAINTIFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

On April 3, 2019, Plaintiff Caren Carl Mandoyan ("Plaintiff") instituted this action by filing the Complaint, which Plaintiff amended voluntarily three times.

On September 9, 2019, Defendants County of Los Angeles (the "County") and John Naimo ("Naimo") filed a Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Defendants Bobby Denham ("Denham") and County of Los Angeles, erroneously sued as Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department ("LASD") also filed a Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). On September 16, 2019, Plaintiff filed a combined Opposition to both motions to dismiss. On September 23, 2019, the County, Naimo, Denham, and LASD filed respective replies.

On October 2, 2019, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Defendants LASD, Sheila Kuehl, Hilda Solis, Janice Hahn, Kathryn Barger, John Naimo, and Bobby Denham, leaving the County as the only remaining defendant in this action.

On October 31, 2019, the Court entered an Order Granting the Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows:

(1) Judgment in full is entered in favor of the County and against Plaintiff as to each and every cause of action asserted in the Third Amended Complaint; (2) Plaintiff shall take nothing by way of his Third Amended Complaint against Defendants, and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice; and (3) The County shall recover its costs of suit from Plaintiff in the sum of $______________ determined in accordance with L.R. 54-2.1.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer