Laureano v. Koenig, CV 19-00352 AB (RAO). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20191204563
Visitors: 4
Filed: Dec. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court has further made a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendatio
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court has further made a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR., District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Petition, all of the records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. The Court has further made a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that the First Amended Petition is denied, and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
