Gilbert R. v. Saul, CV 18-10601-AB (KK). (2019)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20191227681
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which the Commissioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORD
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ANDR BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which the Commissioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDE..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
ANDRÉ BIROTTE, JR., District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, the relevant records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The Court has engaged in de novo review of those portions of the Report to which the Commissioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) reversing the Commissioner's decision; and (2) remanding this action for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
Source: Leagle
