DAVID O. CARTER, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the parties' Proposed Order Entering Judgment and Injunction ("Proposed Order") disposing of this action. It appearing that the parties have reached a settlement of all matters in dispute in this action without trial, and that, as part of such settlement, the parties, through their counsel of record, consent and agree to the entry of this Proposed Order, which shall constitute a final judgment in this action.
1. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of the case and defendants Liquidmetal Coatings, LLC and John Kang (collectively, "Defendants") pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1121, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, 28 U.S.C. § 1367, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114 and 1125, and its inherent equitable authority.
2. Venue as to this action and the Defendants in the Central District of California (Southern Division — Orange County) is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a).
3. On May 13, 2019, Plaintiff Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. ("Plaintiff") filed its Complaint (Dkt. No. 1) in this action alleging claims for federal trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114, federal trademark infringement/false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. § 1125, common law trademark infringement, state unfair competition under Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200 et seq., and common law unfair competition against Defendants.
4. Due to a typographical error, Defendant Liquidmetal Coatings, LLC was incorrectly identified as Liquidmetal Coating, LLC in the caption only, and the case was incorrectly captioned as Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. v. John Kang & Liquidmetal Coating, LLC. The Complaint otherwise identifies the correct defendants. By stipulation, the parties requested a correction to the case caption.
5. Defendants were served with Summons and the Complaint on May 21, 2019 (Dkt. No. 13).
6. On June 10, 2019, Defendants appeared through their counsel of record and filed an answer (Dkt. No. 14).
7. Plaintiff asserts its rights in the trademark LIQUIDMETAL, for which it owns myriad registrations in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office across myriad classes related to alloy and metal structures and amorphous metals, including Reg. No. 3610314, Reg. No. 4732528, Reg. No. 3633282, and Reg. No. 2312889, as well as common law rights (hereinafter, "Mark" or "Marks").
8. Defendants admit the Court's jurisdiction, the validity of the Marks, and Plaintiff's ownership of the Marks.
9. The parties have entered into a Settlement Agreement and acknowledge that the settlement of this dispute is fair, reasonable, and just.
10. The parties understand and agree that violation of any terms of this Order may give rise to the available contempt remedies and penalties.
(1) Affixing the Mark to any products, services, advertisements, promotions, and communications, other than in connection with the sale of offer for sale of products and services relating to metallic coating material in the form of a wire or powder that is sprayed in liquid form on industrial equipment for use as a coating to protect against wear, corrosion, or abrasion;
(2) Using any website that includes the Mark in the domain name, including www.johnkangliquidmetal.com;
(3) Describing John Kang as "John Kang Liquidmetal," "John Kang Liquidmetal Technologies," "John Kang of Liquidmetal Technologies," or "John Kang of Liquidmetal Technologies Inc.," including on websites, blogs, and social media;
(4) Describing Plaintiff Liquidmetal Technologies, Inc. as "John Kang's Liquidmetal," or as a parent, subsidiary, or affiliate of LM Group Holdings, Inc.;
(5) Using the name "LM Group Holdings, Inc." in a manner that suggests it is licensed or affiliated with the "Liquidmetal" brand;
(6) Claiming that Defendants developed applications for "Liquidmetal" on the Apple iPhone;
(7) Claiming that Liquidmetal Coatings, LLC offers products or services relating to amorphous alloys or bulk metallic glasses other than coatings (or composite materials containing amorphous alloys or bulk metallic glasses).
(1) Within fourteen (14) days of entry of this Order on the Court's docket, deliver copies of this Order to all of its officers and directors, and to all agents, managers and employees who have responsibility directly or indirectly for any matters covered by this Order, and maintain a record of recipients to whom the Order has been distributed; and
(2) If, at any time, Defendants learns of any past or future violations of this Order, Defendants shall, within seven (7) days after such knowledge is obtained or sooner if feasible, take appropriate action to terminate or modify the activity so as to comply with this Order.
(1) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62 is and shall be waived and inapplicable to this Order, such that Plaintiff shall be entitled to immediately, among other things, record and enforce the terms hereof, subject to the terms of the separate Settlement Agreement.
(2) The parties waive and release: (a) all rights to seek appellate review or otherwise challenge or contest the validity of this Order; and (b) any claim that a party may have against the other party, its employees, representatives, agents, or attorneys, or that relate to the matters alleged in the Complaint or stated herein, subject to the terms of the separate Settlement Agreement.
(3) This Order and the separate Settlement Agreement constitute a complete settlement and release by Plaintiff of all claims asserted, or that could have been asserted, in its Complaint against Defendants, its employees, representatives, or agents, which are dismissed with prejudice, subject to any claim against Defendants arising out of any violation of this Order or the Settlement Agreement.
(1) This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for purpose of construction, modification, and enforcement of this Order and the separate Settlement Agreement reached by the parties, and making any further orders necessary or proper for the construction of this Order, the enforcement thereof, and the punishment of any violations thereof; and (2) if at any future time Defendants is found to have violated this Order, Defendants shall be liable for all attorney's fees and costs reasonably incurred to enforce this Order or otherwise remedy such violation.
This Order shall be governed by the law of the State of California.
Defendants acknowledges that they have thoroughly reviewed this Order with its attorneys, that they understand and agree to its terms, and that they agree that the terms of this Order shall be entered as the Order of this Court.