Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd v. Terraces, 2:99-CV-02580-RMT-SH. (2020)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20200108682 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2020
Summary: RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK ROBERT M. TAKASUGI , District Judge . Based upon the application for renewal of the judgment of the original judgment, and pursuant to F.R.C.P. 69(a) and C.C.P. 683.110 through 683.320, and for good cause appearing therefore, Judgment in favor of Plaintiff, Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd., and against Defendant, Mary L. Terraces, individually and dba El Tamarido, entered on January 7, 2010, be and the same is hereby renewed in the amounts as set forth below:
More

RENEWAL OF JUDGMENT BY CLERK

Based upon the application for renewal of the judgment of the original judgment, and pursuant to F.R.C.P. 69(a) and C.C.P. § 683.110 through § 683.320, and for good cause appearing therefore,

Judgment in favor of Plaintiff, Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd., and against Defendant, Mary L. Terraces, individually and dba El Tamarido, entered on January 7, 2010, be and the same is hereby renewed in the amounts as set forth below:

Renewal of money judgment

a. Total judgment $ 8,500.00 b. Costs after judgment $ 00.00 c. Subtotal (add a and b) $ 8,500.00 d. Credits $ 0.00 e. Subtotal (subtract d from c) $ 8,500.00 f. Interest after judgment (.47%) $ 398.95 g. Fee for filing renewal of application $ 00.00 ___________ h. Total renewed judgment (add e, f and g) $ 8,898.95
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer