Nelson v. Harris Corporation, 2:19-cv-00029-RGK-SS. (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200113794
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 10, 2020
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . [PROPOSED] ORDER The Court has reviewed the Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice (the "Stipulation") filed by Plaintiff KIM NELSON ("Plaintiff") and Defendant HARRIS CORPORATION ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-refe
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE R. GARY KLAUSNER , District Judge . [PROPOSED] ORDER The Court has reviewed the Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice (the "Stipulation") filed by Plaintiff KIM NELSON ("Plaintiff") and Defendant HARRIS CORPORATION ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties"). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-refer..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
R. GARY KLAUSNER, District Judge.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Stipulation of Dismissal of Entire Action with Prejudice (the "Stipulation") filed by Plaintiff KIM NELSON ("Plaintiff") and Defendant HARRIS CORPORATION ("Defendant") (collectively, the "Parties").
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff's Complaint in the above-referenced action shall be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice, with the Court retaining jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Parties' settlement, if necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
