Vargas v. Castaneda, EDCV 18-1844 SJO (RAO). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200115a48
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 07, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2020
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, all of the other records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"). The time for filing objections to the Report has passed and no objections have been received. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magi
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE S. JAMES OTERO , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, all of the other records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"). The time for filing objections to the Report has passed and no objections have been received. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magis..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint, all of the other records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Report"). The time for filing objections to the Report has passed and no objections have been received. The Court hereby accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
Source: Leagle
