In re B.M., LA CV18-03362 JAK (FFMx) (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200122b03
Visitors: 2
Filed: Jan. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2020
Summary: ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 78) JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . The Court, having reviewed the parties' Joint Stipulation to Voluntary Dismissal of these consolidated matters, LA CV 18-03362 JAK (FFMx) and SA CV 18-00684 JAK (FFMx), and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over implementation and enforcement of the agreement, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation. Accordingly, the cases are dismissed with prejudice. The Court will continu
Summary: ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 78) JOHN A. KRONSTADT , District Judge . The Court, having reviewed the parties' Joint Stipulation to Voluntary Dismissal of these consolidated matters, LA CV 18-03362 JAK (FFMx) and SA CV 18-00684 JAK (FFMx), and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over implementation and enforcement of the agreement, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation. Accordingly, the cases are dismissed with prejudice. The Court will continue..
More
ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARILY DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE (DKT. 78)
JOHN A. KRONSTADT, District Judge.
The Court, having reviewed the parties' Joint Stipulation to Voluntary Dismissal of these consolidated matters, LA CV 18-03362 JAK (FFMx) and SA CV 18-00684 JAK (FFMx), and request that the Court retain jurisdiction over implementation and enforcement of the agreement, hereby GRANTS the Stipulation. Accordingly, the cases are dismissed with prejudice. The Court will continue to exercise jurisdiction over the Agreement should any action for implementation or for enforcement be required. Any pending hearings in this matter are vacated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
