Kim v. Kim, 8:19-cv-00755 JVS (FFM). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200224668
Visitors: 12
Filed: Feb. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION AGAINST ALL PARTIES WITH PREJUDICE JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . The Court, having considered the Joint Request for Dismissal of the Entire Action Against all Parties with Prejudice, stipulated to and submitted by Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Daniel Kim and The Law Offices of Daniel Kim, Corporation, and Defendants/Counterclaimants Daniel Y. Kim and The Law Offices of Daniel Y. Kim, A Professional Law Corporation, and with good cause appearing, IT IS HER
Summary: ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION AGAINST ALL PARTIES WITH PREJUDICE JAMES V. SELNA , District Judge . The Court, having considered the Joint Request for Dismissal of the Entire Action Against all Parties with Prejudice, stipulated to and submitted by Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Daniel Kim and The Law Offices of Daniel Kim, Corporation, and Defendants/Counterclaimants Daniel Y. Kim and The Law Offices of Daniel Y. Kim, A Professional Law Corporation, and with good cause appearing, IT IS HERE..
More
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION AGAINST ALL PARTIES WITH PREJUDICE
JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.
The Court, having considered the Joint Request for Dismissal of the Entire Action Against all Parties with Prejudice, stipulated to and submitted by Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Daniel Kim and The Law Offices of Daniel Kim, Corporation, and Defendants/Counterclaimants Daniel Y. Kim and The Law Offices of Daniel Y. Kim, A Professional Law Corporation, and with good cause appearing,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the entire action including all claims and counterclaims, is dismissed with prejudice, with all parties to bear their own costs, interest, and attorneys' fees in this matter. The Court retains jurisdiction to entertain such further proceedings and to enter such further orders as may be necessary or appropriate to implement and enforce the provisions of the settlement agreement and permanent injunction in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
