Estrada v. Marriott International, Inc., 2:19-cv-07869 AB (JPRx). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200225704
Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) ANDRE BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . [PROPOSED] ORDER The Court, having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation and finding good cause therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. That the Stipulation is APPROVED. 2. The above-referenced action is dismissed without prejudice as to all Defendants. 3. Plaintiff and all Defendants are to bear their respective fees and costs incurred in this action. IT IS SO O
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) ANDRE BIROTTE, JR. , District Judge . [PROPOSED] ORDER The Court, having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation and finding good cause therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. That the Stipulation is APPROVED. 2. The above-referenced action is dismissed without prejudice as to all Defendants. 3. Plaintiff and all Defendants are to bear their respective fees and costs incurred in this action. IT IS SO OR..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)
ANDRE BIROTTE, JR., District Judge.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Court, having reviewed the foregoing Stipulation and finding good cause therefor,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. That the Stipulation is APPROVED.
2. The above-referenced action is dismissed without prejudice as to all Defendants.
3. Plaintiff and all Defendants are to bear their respective fees and costs incurred in this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle