Artega v. Clark, 2:19-cv-07226 ODW (AFM). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200225720
Visitors: 19
Filed: Feb. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2020
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT THE
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT THER..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing the action with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
